To agree to be part of a formal agreement or contract To the first extent, the High Court decided that the applicant was entitled to provide counselling services during the first four-year period, but that he was not entitled to that right for another period. The obligation for the parties to agree on the duration of an additional period was not applicable, as it was an agreement that did not contain a «mechanism» or «objective standard» for the Tribunal to «reach a conclusion» on the duration of the extension. An agreement may be concluded if an agreement contains commitments in the future to conclude a subsequent agreement the terms of which are not certain at the time of the initial agreement. The complainant pointed out that the expression used in the BSM SPA (i.e. «has the choice») was mandatory.